<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Empower Mobility® | Mobility. Empowered.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.empowermobility.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.empowermobility.com</link>
	<description>Custom Mobile Software Development for Apple iOS and other mobile platforms.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:30:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Mobile Data Crunch Is Coming by John Cisar</title>
		<link>http://www.empowermobility.com/the-mobile-data-crunch-is-coming/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>John Cisar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.empowermobility.com/?p=226#comment-5</guid>
		<description>The existing data infrastructure in the US cannot meet the increasing demand placed by an increasing smart phone adoption and still?  As a country we are much dependant on 19th century technology because companies don’t want to take the expense to improve their managed infrastructures. And qhy should they?  North American data consumers are collectively captive.

What concerns me about the foreseeable data crunch is that instead of taking the expense of making 21st century improvements to our comparatively aged 19th century infrastructure (in Asia, smart phones are more powerful and less expensive, broadband is cheaper and more accessible); North American Communication companies opt to meter customer usage. We are a collective captive audience to our national carrier policies. Our data infrastructure management isn’t subsidized or nationalized. There is no incentive yet to improve it. Until mobile data consumers tell their carries how willing they to pay more for improved broadband service, North America will fall to second class country status for data accessibility and user experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The existing data infrastructure in the US cannot meet the increasing demand placed by an increasing smart phone adoption and still?  As a country we are much dependant on 19th century technology because companies don’t want to take the expense to improve their managed infrastructures. And qhy should they?  North American data consumers are collectively captive.</p>
<p>What concerns me about the foreseeable data crunch is that instead of taking the expense of making 21st century improvements to our comparatively aged 19th century infrastructure (in Asia, smart phones are more powerful and less expensive, broadband is cheaper and more accessible); North American Communication companies opt to meter customer usage. We are a collective captive audience to our national carrier policies. Our data infrastructure management isn’t subsidized or nationalized. There is no incentive yet to improve it. Until mobile data consumers tell their carries how willing they to pay more for improved broadband service, North America will fall to second class country status for data accessibility and user experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on KISS is Still IN by John Canning</title>
		<link>http://www.empowermobility.com/kiss-is-still-in/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>John Canning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.empowermobility.com/?p=157#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Well said!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

